Runway and airport accessibility study
Services / Airport feasibility

Airport feasibility & runway studies

A clear view of how an airport works today, what is limiting it, and which practical improvements are worth assessing.

Airport consultancy

Make the next airport decision with the right evidence.

We connect runway planning, weather accessibility, navigation aids, obstacles and flight procedures in one feasibility study. The scope is shaped around the airport’s question and the data available, so decision-makers can compare the current situation with realistic alternatives.

Runway planning

Orientation and usability

Assess runway orientation and usability against local wind conditions, crosswind limits and operational requirements. Historical METAR/SPECI data can help compare runway options and identify weather-related constraints.

Accessibility

Approaches and navigation aids

Review current approach minima and weather exposure, then assess whether procedure, ILS, DME/DME, SBAS, GBAS or other navigation-aid changes could improve access. Findings depend on terrain, obstacles, aircraft operations and local data.

Airspace and procedures

PBN options and operational impact

Compare conventional and PBN concepts with the surrounding airspace. Where traffic and operational data support it, scenario analysis can estimate changes in track miles, flight time, fuel, CO₂ and capacity.

What can an airport feasibility study include?

A study may combine runway orientation and wind coverage, runway usability, meteorological accessibility, obstacle and terrain constraints, current instrument procedures, navaid options, airspace interfaces and operational scenarios. We agree the level of analysis before work begins; not every project needs every workstream.

For procedure or airspace changes, potential reductions in distance, time, fuel or emissions are modeled estimates, not guaranteed savings. They depend on the traffic sample, aircraft mix, weather, operational assumptions and implementation constraints used in the comparison.

Related work: airport accessibility and navaid studies, instrument flight procedure design, aerodrome safeguarding and obstacle studies, and conventional-to-PBN feasibility.

A useful outcome

A practical comparison, not a generic recommendation.

The study sets out the baseline, the options that merit further work, the constraints and the evidence behind each conclusion. This helps airport teams and authorities decide whether to proceed, gather more data or keep the current arrangement.

Start with the decision you need to make

Tell us whether you are considering a runway, improving access in adverse weather, reviewing navaid investment or modernising procedures. We can shape a focused scope with your airport, CAA or ANSP team.